Prediction of Hu Na vs Pamela Jung Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
H. Na vs P. Jung

Hu Na

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

215

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pamela Jung

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

215

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Na 1 - 0 Jung

They have played 3 sets in total, with Hu Na winning 2 and Pamela Jung winning 1. The last match between Hu Na and Pamela Jung was at the ITF Chicago, 02-01-1984, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Hu Na getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Na	1
Jung	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Chicago(01-02-84)

Stats

Hu Na

Pamela Jung

H. Na vs P. Jung H2H Profile

H. Na	Stats	P. Jung
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.24% (96-121)	Career Total W/L	38.28% (49-79)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

H. Na vs P. Jung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hu Na has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pamela Jung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hu Na, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pamela Jung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Hu Na has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pamela Jung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Hu Na has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pamela Jung winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Hu Na has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 16/16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 42/58). Pamela Jung has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 35% (W/L 7/13).
Player level: In the last year, Hu Na has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pamela Jung has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hu Na winning 1 times and Pamela Jung being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hu Na winning 2 and Pamela Jung winning 1.
The last match between Hu Na and Pamela Jung was at the ITF Chicago, 02-01-1984, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Hu Na getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hu Na has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pamela Jung has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hu Na has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pamela Jung has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Hu Na has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pamela Jung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hu Na vs Pamela Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Na vs P. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

H. Na	Stats	P. Jung
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

H. Na Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Key Biscayne - 15-03-1991
Q1 Kim SteinmetzK. Steinmetz	L	6-1 3-0 RET	Stats
Palm Springs - 25-02-1991
R2 Pam NelsonP. Nelson	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Manhattan Beach - 13-08-1990
Q1 Audra KellerA. Keller	L	4-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Albuquerque - 06-08-1990
R3 Karine QuentrecK. Quentrec	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Newport - 16-07-1990
R4 Anne SmithA. Smith	L	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF New Braunfels - 21-01-1991
R3 Katrina AdamsK. Adams	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
ITF Mission - 14-01-1991
R3 Joannette KrugerJ. Kruger	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
ITF Midland 1 - 07-01-1991
R3 Nicole StrnadovaN. Strnadova	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
ITF Ramat Hasharon 1 - 19-03-1990
Robyn FieldR. Field	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R4 Sandrine BregnardS. Bregnard	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

H. Na vs P. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

H. Na	Stats	P. Jung
44.24% (96/121)	YTD Win/Loss	38.28% (49/79)
45.01% (221/270)	Sets Win/Loss	40.14% (116/173)
48.61% (2183/2308)	Games Win/Loss	47.31% (1241/1382)
42.00% (42/58)	Hard Win/Loss	39.74% (31/47)
42.31% (11/15)	Clay Win/Loss	38.10% (8/13)
50.00% (12/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	28.57% (2/5)
50.00% (16/16)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
343.5	Average Opponent Rank	423.53
50.00% (1/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
44.44% (8/10)	Challenger W/L	45.71% (32/38)
42.42% (14/19)	Futures W/L	36.36% (4/7)
44% (94/215)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	38% (49/128)
29% (2/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (3/6)
47% (28/60)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (15/33)
84% (95/80)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (50/41)
16% (95/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (50/9)
12% (121/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (78/8)